nrich
enriching mathematics
Skip over navigation
Home
Home
Students
Guide and features
Teachers
Guide and features
STEM
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
AskNRICH
Forum
early years
Featured Early Years Foundation Stage; US Kindergarten
Early years
primary
Featured UK Key Stage 1&2; US Grades 1-4
Primary teachers
secondary
Featured UK Key Stage 3-5; US Grades 5-12
Secondary teachers
primary lower
Featured UK Key Stage 1, US Grade 1 & 2
primary
primary
Featured UK Key Stage 2; US Grade 3 & 4
secondary lower
Featured UK Key Stages 3 & 4; US Grade 5-10
secondary
secondary upper
Featured UK Key Stage 4 & 5; US Grade 11 & 12
Topics
translate
Problem
Getting Started
Solution
Teachers' Resources
Printable page
Contrary Logic
Stage: 5
Challenge Level:
This problem is in two parts. The first uses logic in the context of English language whereas the second uses logic in the clearer context of mathematics
Part 1.
Which of the following are certainly true, which are certainly false. How many statements form equivalent pairs? Are there any parts of the problem which are debatable or unclear?
If my team wins the world cup tomorrow then I'll be happy tomorrow.
If I am happy tomorrow then my team will win the world cup tomorrow.
If I am not happy tomorrow then my team will not win the world cup tomorrow.
If my team does not win the world cup tomorrow then I will not be happy tomorrow.
If this is maize then it grew from a seed
If this grew from a seed then it is maize
If this did not grow from a seed then it is not maize
If this is not maize then it did not grow from a seed
If Rover is a dog then Rover is an animal
If Rover is not an animal then Rover is not a dog
If Rover is not a dog then Rover is an animal
If Rover is an animal then Rover is a dog
These ideas will help you to understand part 2.
Part 2.
In mathematical logic the implication arrows $\Rightarrow$ and $\Leftrightarrow$ are used to connect expressions as follows:
$p\Rightarrow q$ means 'IF $p$ is true THEN $q$ is true.
$p\Leftrightarrow q$ means both $p\Rightarrow q$ AND $q \Rightarrow p$ simultaneously.
Convince yourself that
$$
\left(p\Rightarrow q\right) \Leftrightarrow \left((NOT q) \Rightarrow (NOT p)\right)
$$
The expression on the right is called the
contrapositive
of the statement on the left. Since they are linked by $\Leftrightarrow$, proving one side will automatically prove the other.
Consider these statements involving positive integers $n$ and $m$.
1: $n+m$ is odd $\Rightarrow n\neq m$.
2: $n+m$ is even $\Rightarrow$ $n$ and $m$ are either both even or both odd
3: $n^2$ is even $\Rightarrow n$ is even.
4: $n^3$ is odd $\Rightarrow n$ is odd.
5: $n$ mod (4) = 2 or 3 $\Rightarrow$ $n$ is not a perfect square.
Write out the contrapositive versions of these statements and use these to prove the statements. You can assume that an even number can be written as $2N$ and an odd number as $2M+1$.
Inequality/inequalities
.
Number theory
.
Manipulating algebraic expressions/formulae
.
Visualising
.
Mathematical reasoning & proof
.
Making and proving conjectures
.
Generalising
.
Patterned numbers
.
Dynamical systems
.
Theorem and contrapositive
.