nrich
enriching mathematics
Skip over navigation
Home
Home
Students
Guide and features
Teachers
Guide and features
STEM
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
AskNRICH
Forum
early years
Featured Early Years Foundation Stage; US Kindergarten
Early years
primary
Featured UK Key Stage 1&2; US Grades 1-4
Primary teachers
secondary
Featured UK Key Stage 3-5; US Grades 5-12
Secondary teachers
primary lower
Featured UK Key Stage 1, US Grade 1 & 2
primary
primary
Featured UK Key Stage 2; US Grade 3 & 4
secondary lower
Featured UK Key Stages 3 & 4; US Grade 5-10
secondary
secondary upper
Featured UK Key Stage 4 & 5; US Grade 11 & 12
Topics
translate
Problem
Getting Started
Solution
Teachers' Resources
Printable page
Random Inequalities
Stage: 5
Challenge Level:
James Bell from the MacMillan academy was the first person to crack this toughnut, with this solution. He also noted that the problem as it stood only held for positive random variables -- well spotted. Well dones James!
For the first part James cleverly used random variables which only took a single value to work out that $??$ must equal $1$:
Part 1:
Consider $X$ such that $P(X=10)=1$ $E(|X|)=10$ taking $a=9$ we get left hand side equal to $1$ so the right handside must equal at least $1 =\frac{10}{9^{??}}$. If $??$ were $2$ or greater this wouldn't be satisfied.
Now consider $P(X=0.5)=1$ so $E(|X|)=0.5$. Taking $a=0.45$ we get left hand side equal to $1$ so the right handside must equal at least $1 =\frac{0.5}{0.45^{??}}$. If $??$ were $0$ or less this wouldn't be satisfied and so $??=1$.
Part 2:
Our task is to design a distribution such that the chance of $X$ being at least $2\sigma$ from the mean is maximised.
James first argues that a distribution which satisfied the inquality exactly must have a maximum value of $2\sigma$ by shifting probability around. Some more details would be needed for a fully convincing explanation, but the argument is in essence correct and shows very sophisticated statistical reasoning
.
If a solution existed where $X$ could take a value greater than $2\sigma$ from the mean then we could use this to create a new distribution $Y$ by changing the values of events leading to a difference being greater than $2\sigma$ to values leading to a difference of $2\sigma$, thus making the probability of the difference being greater than $2\sigma$ zero. Of course, this would decrease $2\sigma$ for $Y$; some of the probability for $Y$ could be moved from near the mean to outside $2\sigma$ for $Y$ without moving $2\sigma$ for $Y$ as far out to where it was originally for $X$, meaning that the probability of $|Y-\mu|$ being greater than $2\sigma$ would increase above $\frac{1}{4}$. As we know this to be impossible, any such distribution must have $P(|X-\mu|> 2\sigma)=0$.
With this insight, James was able to search for a solution
Assuming symmetry, to find a solution let us set
$$
P(X-\mu=2\sigma)=P(\mu-X=2\sigma)=0.125\,,
$$
as together they must add to $0.25$ or $\frac{1}{4}$ the other $\frac{3}{4}$ must be distributed right on the mean in order to makle the variance as small as possible which suggests the distribution attached for $\sigma=1\,, \mu=0$, and sure enough calculating sigma from the distribution gives $\sigma=1$ as well confirming that it works.
Here is the picture:
Experimental probability
.
Index notation/Indices
.
Maths Supporting SET
.
Inequality/inequalities
.
Diophantine equations
.
Graphs
.
Expectation algebra
.
Manipulating algebraic expressions/formulae
.
Probability distributions, expectation and variance
.
Mathematical reasoning & proof
.