There is a variation to this problem called
Consecutive Negative Numbers. Teachers may need to choose
between the two problems - doing both may involve too much
overlap.
Why do this problem?
This problem has the capacity to interest young and old alike.
I have used it with a wide range of attainment levels, and new
things keep on being found out. It offers opportunities to work
together when sharing results and making decisions as to which
consecutive numbers to look at next.
Possible approach
It is sometimes useful to suggest to the students that they
are being detectives and seeking out links, relations and
reasons.
To introduce the problem, go through what consecutive means,
getting suggestions from the pupils for the starting number. It is
good to let the pupils select the three operations and to take four
or five examples, but not to discuss how many possibilities there
are at this stage.
Most children find some connections between the eight answers
that they find. The first finding is usually that all the answers
are even. The fact that $0$, $-2$, and $-4$ appear with every group
of four consecutive numbers suggests the question "why?" leading to
interesting discussions about the occurrence of negative
numbers.
Key questions
Do you think you've found all the possibilities?
Tell me about your answers.
Do you notice anything about your answers?
Can you explain why these things always happen?
Possible extension
I have found that all the students who have been involved in
this investigation have got very excited as various observations
are made, patterns seen and questions asked. The most enjoyable
times for me have been hearing ten year olds using their own form
of algebra and coming to some powerful [for them] realisations
about why every one has a $0$, $-2$ and $-4$.
The problem has also been the starting point for some pupils
to be able to ask "I wonder what would happen if ...?" And in this
case it's been:
... we used more consecutive numbers each time?
... we had a starting point in the negative numbers?
... we took consecutive to mean going up in $2$s?
... we were allowed to use fractions or decimals in between
the whole numbers?
For the highest-attaining
These pupils would be encouraged to
work on proofs. They could also begin to make comparisons - say
between using four consecutuve numbers and six consecutive numbers.
Some learners may want to examine other properties of the answers
for any set of four consectuive numbers and this could lead on to
generalisations.
Possible support
On the odd occasions that pupils needed support I have found
that putting a number of pupils together to work as a sharing group
is all that has been necessary.
These notes are taken from writings by
Bernard Bagnall who has used this activity more than sixty times
and chose it as his favourite problem on the NRICH site.