Copyright © University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.
Derek (no school given) offered the
following insights into this problem: - and nicely explained too -
thank you Derek.
From observation, we compile the table below:
n-row pyramid |
Ways to count 1-2-3-... |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
15 |
... |
... |
The pattern can be deduced by considering route backwards, i.e.
from n back to 1. The general n-row pyramid is shown below:
Starting at the orange square, we assert that there are 0 routes
leading to the final square:
1 step earlier, at the bright yellow squares, there is 1 route
leading to the final square:
1 step earlier, at the light yellow squares, the situation becomes
slightly different.The top, left and right squares all have 1 route
leading to the final square. However, the middle squares have 2
routes as they each connect to 2 bright yellow squares (each of
which are routes leading to the final square):
1 step earlier, the top, left and right squares all have 1 route
whilst the middle squares have 3 routes as they each connect to 2
light yellow squares, bearing a total of 3 routes. We repeat this
reasoning and get the following pattern:
It is clear that these are the binomial coefficients. 2 of Pascal's
triangles have been arranged together and the numbers along the two
slanted edges represent how many ways to count 1-2-3-...-n. For
example, in the diagram of the 6-row pyramid above, we see that
there are 1+5+10+10+5+1+5+10+10+5+1 = 63 ways to count
1-2-3-4-5-6.
We further notice that 1, 5, 10, 10, 5, 1 are the binomial
coefficients $5 \choose {k}$ $,k = 1, 2, 3, \cdots, 5 $. We
generalise by claiming that the number of ways of counting
$1-2-3-...-n$ is twice (because there are two Pascal's triangles)
the sum of all the binomial coefficients of the $n-1^{th}$ row
minus 1 (because of the overlapped 1 down the central column) which
can be written as $2\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}$ ${n-1}\choose{k}$ $ - 1$.
Editor's comment: at this point it may be
worth mentioniing that the sum of the binomial coefficients are
powers of 2. Why?
Chen of the Chinese High School took a
slightly different approach (similar to the one offered by Andrei
of Tudor Vianu National College):
We shall define $T(n)$ to be the number of ways to count 1 - n
in a triangular array of 1 - n. We shall solve this problem by
establishing a recurrence relation, and hence finding a formula for
$T(n)$.
When $n=1, T(1)=1$ and when $ n=2, T(2)=3$. We observe that in
a triangular array of 1-3, the number of ways to get to the number
'2' directly above the number '3' is given by $T(2)$ and the number
of ways to get to the '2' on the left of '3' can be easily computed
to be 2.
Similarly, there are 2 ways to get to the '2' on the right of
the '3'.
Hence, $T(3)=T(2)+2^2=7$ For $T(4)$, we observe again that the
number of ways to get to the '3' directly above of the '4' is given
to be $T(3)$.
Furthermore, the number of ways to get to the '3' to the left
of the '4' is the sum of the number of ways to get to the '2's
adjacent to the '3'.
Since by the previous result, there are 2 ways of getting to
the '2', there are 2+2=4 ways of getting to the '3' to the left of
the '4', and similarly for the '3' to the right of the '4'. Hence,
$T(4)=T(3)+2(2^2)=T(3)+2^3$ Extending this argument to T(n), we
obtain the recurrence $T(n)=T(n-1)+2^{(n-1)}$.
However, since $T(n-1)=T(n-2)+2^{(n-2)}$, which is also equal
to $T(n-3)+2^{(n-3)}+2^{(n-2)}$.
Thus, it is not difficult to see that $T(n)=
1+2+2^2+2^3+...+2^{(n-1)} or 2^n - 1$