Copyright © University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.
The ancient Egyptians didn't write fractions with a numerator
greater than 1 - they wouldn't, for example, write $\frac{2}{7}$,
$\frac{5}{9}$, $\frac{123}{467}$.....
Instead they wrote fractions like these as a sum of
different unit fractions.
Experiment with this interactivity to see some of the different
ways of writing numbers as Egyptian Fractions:
This text is usually replaced by the Flash movie.
There are several NRICH problems based on Egyptian fractions. You
can start by exploring unit fractions at
Keep
it Simple
In this problem we are going to start by considering how the
Egyptians might have written fractions with a numerator of 2 (i.e.
of the form $\frac{2}{n}$).
For example
$\frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{3}$ (but since these are the
same, this wasn't allowed.)
or
$\frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{12}$
or
$\frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} + \frac{1}{20} +
\frac{1}{12}$
or
$\frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{30} +
\frac{1}{20} + \frac{1}{12}$
or
$\frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{7} +
\frac{1}{42} + \frac{1}{31} + \frac{1}{930} + \frac{1}{21} +
\frac{1}{420} + \frac{1}{13} + \frac{1}{156}$
and so on, and so on!!
You might want to check that these are correct.
(If you can't see how these have been generated, take a look at
Jamie's method in
Keep
it Simple )
BUT wouldn't it be simpler to write it as the sum of just
two different unit
fractions?
For $\frac{2}{3}$ that's quite easy.........$\frac{2}{3} =
\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6}$
But is it always so easy?
Try some other fractions with a numerator of 2.
Can they also be written as the sum of just two different unit
fractions?
Can all fractions with a numerator of 2 (i.e. of the form
$\frac{2}{n}$) be written as the sum of just two different unit
fractions?
Can you find an efficient method for doing this?
You might want to explore fractions of the form $\frac{3}{n}$,
$\frac{4}{n}$, $\frac{5}{n}$...... and think about how the
Egyptians would have represented these, using sums with the least
number of unit fractions.
NOTES AND BACKGROUND
The ancient Egyptians lived thousands of years ago, how do we know
what they thought about numbers? A little research on this topic
will show that famous mathematicians have asked and answered
questions about the Egyptian fraction system for hundreds of years.
You can find references to results in this field that were proved
in the 1200s and in the 2000s, and you can also find some open
questions - things mathematicians think are true, but have not been
proved yet.
Throughout history, different civilisations have had different ways
of representing numbers. Some of these systems seem strange or
complicated from our perspective. The ancient Egyptian ideas about
fractions are quite surprising.
For example, they wrote $\frac{1}{5}$, $\frac{1}{16}$ and
$\frac{1}{429}$ as

(but using their numerals)
They didn't write fractions with a numerator greater than 1 - they
wouldn't, for example,write $\frac{2}{7}$, $ \frac{5}{9}$, $
\frac{123}{167}$.... although there is evidence that the specific
fraction $\frac{2}{3}$ was used by the Egyptians, and $\frac{3}{4}$
sometimes as well. They had special symbols for these two
fractions.
The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus is an important historical source
for studying Egyptian fractions - it was probably a reference
sheet, or a lesson sheet and contains Egyptian fraction sums for
all the fractions $\frac{2}{3}$, $ \frac{2}{5}$, $ \frac{2}{7}...
\frac{2}{101}$.
Why did they only include the odd ones?
$\frac{4}{n}$ and $\frac{3}{n}$
In the 1940s, the mathematicians Paul Erdos and Ernst G. Straus
conjectured that every fraction with numerator = 4 can be written
as an Egyptian fraction sum with three terms. If you have found an
example that appears to need more than three, can you find an
alternative sum? Can you find a reason why it must work, or a
counter-example - the conjecture isn't yet proved. It is proved for
$\frac{3}{n}$.